Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Comments

I posted a comment on Different Ideas' blog about the bad reputation tattoos are given.

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Early Draft


Romance novels are known for being predictable and cheesy, yet women are buying them by the boat load. Some women are spending as much as $100 monthly, solely on romance novels. One of the best-selling fiction categories on the market right now, third best in fact, is romance fiction. Publishers are scavenging, trying to find new material to put on the shelves of the “Romance” section of book stores. Many readers are being newly introduced to other books through romance novels. Yet critics have made clear that they believe romance novels do not provide the same intellectual benefits as other forms of literature. Some of these critics point out that reading rates have declined, and those who read romance do not venture into other genres. Others argue that the genre of Romance, compared to other literature, is neither thought provoking nor serious about moral issues. However, recent research and statistics will disprove and silence such critics. Romance novels do indeed provide the same benefits as reading other literature. 

Over the past couple of centuries, various reports such as the National Endowment for the Arts’ “To Read or Not to Read” were issued about the decline of reading in America. However this is no longer the case, and in fact, reading is on the rise in America. According to the NEA’s 2008 report “Reading on the Rise,” reading rates have increased significantly among all races and ages. The report states, “After decades of declining trends, there has been a decisive and unambiguous increase among virtually every group measured in this comprehensive national survey.” But more specifically, reading is on the rise among fiction genres. Research shows that 28.5% of novel and short story readers prefer to read romance books. Thus, illustrating that reading is on the rise among romance readers. 

Yet though more people may be reading romance, this does not necessarily mean they are reading other literature as well. Critics argue that unlike other genres, romance does not serve as a gateway into other literature. But on the contrary, authors often quote Jane Austen and William Shakespeare as influential story-tellers of romance that encouraged them to read and write. Stephanie Meyer, author of the Twilight series, makes a similar statement when she reveals her list of most significant authors. She confesses, “My favorite authors/biggest influences are (in no particular order) Orson Scott Card, Jane Austen, William Shakespeare, Maeve Binchy, Charlotte Bronte, Daphne DuMaurier, L.M. Montgomery, Louisa May Alcott, Eva Ibbotson, William Goldman, Douglas Adams, Janet Evanovich...” The listed authors vary in style from romance to science fiction to poetry and non-fiction. Thus, not only did romance authors such as Maeve Binchy and Shakespeare inspire her, but authors of other genres did as well. Further, such literature inspired Meyer to become an author herself, showing that romance can act as a gateway into other genres of literature. 

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Comments

I recently commented on Paris Hilton's blog about the amount of texting people do now. 

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Outdated Advisors

My friend from another school called me last night, very frustrated and upset. When I asked her what was wrong, she proceeded to rant endlessly about how useless college academic advisors are. She explained to me that her academic advisor told her to sign up for two classes that were prerequisites for her major. It tuns out that those classes will not count toward her major, and she is now 6 credits behind schedule for graduation. 


To be honest, she is not the first person I have heard of having this problem. Many of my friends here at SMU have had problems with their advisors. It seems to me that the system for academic counselors is outdated, especially for undecided majors. As an undeclared first year student, I look to my advisor for advice and guidance. Yet every time I have been to my advisor’s office, she seems unorganized and clueless. Her answer to most all of my questions is, “I’m not sure, let’s look in the course book.” Or she has to call someone else for help. 


I do the majority of class scheduling by myself because it is all online now. The only reason to see my advisor is for her to tell me which classes I still need to take. But couldn’t I do that online too? It only seems obvious to me that if most of our scheduling is online now, our advising should be too. It would be much more efficient than having every student signing up for appointments with their advisors

Online programs such as Access could then show each student their completed and required credits for graduation on time in a more user-friendly manner. Thus allowing students to determine which classes they need to take whenever they want, and eliminating simple mistakes. There would be far less errors in scheduling, such as my friend’s. 


I’m not proposing that we eliminate academic advisors completely however. Advisors for specific majors can be useful because they are well informed on which classes a student needs to take. However, I believe that advisors for undeclared majors need to either be better informed or given less responsibility. In addition, programs such as the Hegi Career Center at SMU are able to assist students who have trouble determining a major much more effectively than academic advisors


I honestly believe that academic advisors for undeclared majors at Universities are out of date. A more effective and efficient program needs to be put in their place soon so that students, such as my friend, aren’t stuck taking unnecessary classes due to simple mistakes. Have you had a similar experience? What changes do you propose

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

“I’m lucky I know, but I wanna go home...” -Michael Buble

Coming to college, I felt like this would be the time in my life when I become more independent from my parents. I have always been very close to my parents, so this was a tough concept for me to grasp. However, I found when I got to college that I have not lost my bond with parents in the slightest. I speak to them on the phone on a daily basis to tell them about my daily occurrences and to seek advice. 


My friends and I were talking about this topic the other day and they all had similar experiences. We all expected ourselves to become less homesick as the year went on. However, we find ourselves counting down the days until we get to go home again. Don’t get me wrong, I love SMU. But there’s nothing like home. I miss home cooked meals, my dog, my bed, and my family. It got me thinking as to when I will begin to feel that separation from my parents. 


I’m sure that this feeling varies person to person based on their relationship with their parents. However, I have found homesickness to be a common theme on campus recently. Has anyone else had the same experience?

Sunday, March 15, 2009

The Dumbest Generation: Screen Time Response

While reading a chapter called "Screen Time" of the book The Dumbest Generation by Mark Bauerlein, I came across an interesting point. In the chapter the author discusses how "The Millennials," or the Generation born between 1980- 2000, are especially gifted with technology. On page 73 Bauerline writes, "Young (technology) users don't just possess good skills- they have 'innate ability.' They don't just tinker online; they 'construct knowledge.'" 


While I do agree that “The Millennials” have great depth of knowledge and skill with technology, I do not agree that it is an “innate ability.” I believe that they achieve their knowledge of technology from using it on a daily basis for years of their lives. When I was in elementary school, it was required for students to take computer classes to be familiar with the programs and layouts. These classes continued throughout by high school education. In addition to that, I was using technology on a daily basis for recreation. Thus, why I am so familiar with technology. 


Although Bauerline may have been exaggerating when he said that young people have an “innate ability,” I think that he could have found a better way to express their familiarity with technology. Perhaps he could have called their understanding of technology a “second nature” because it is such a major part of their lives now, and it feel almost natural to them. 

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Comments

I just posted a comment to KEE's blog about the popularity of Frozen Yogurt (or as I like to call it, FroYo).